GDPR Lawful Basis for Processing: The Complete Guide to Choosing Your Legal Foundation (2025)

Here's something that trips up even experienced compliance professionals: choosing your lawful basis for processing isn't just another GDPR checkbox. It's the foundational decision that determines how you collect data, what rights individuals have, and whether your entire privacy program actually works.

I've seen businesses spend thousands on privacy policies and consent management systems, only to discover they were using the wrong lawful basis all along. The result? They had to scrap everything and start over.

Once you've determined GDPR applies to your business, understanding lawful basis becomes your first and most critical compliance task. Get this wrong, and every privacy document you create will be built on a shaky foundation.

Let me walk you through exactly how to choose the right lawful basis for your specific business needs—and why it matters more than you might think.

What Is Lawful Basis for Processing Under GDPR?

Under GDPR Article 6, you cannot process personal data unless you have a valid legal justification—what the regulation calls a "lawful basis." Think of it as your legal permission slip for handling someone's personal information.

But here's what makes this tricky: you can't just pick your favorite lawful basis and move on. You need to choose the one that genuinely fits your processing activity. And you need to get it right the first time, because switching later is nearly impossible under GDPR.

Why this decision is so critical:

Your choice of lawful basis determines:

• What information you must include in your privacy policy
• Whether you need explicit consent from individuals
• What data subject rights apply (especially the right to erasure)
• How you can use the data in the future
• Your obligations if someone objects to processing

I recently worked with a SaaS company that initially chose "consent" as their lawful basis for customer data processing. They quickly realized they couldn't simply rely on consent when their Terms of Service already created a contract. They had to rebuild their entire consent mechanism and update all their privacy documentation. That mistake cost them three months and significant resources.

The 6 Lawful Bases for Processing Personal Data (Article 6 GDPR)

GDPR provides exactly six lawful bases for processing personal data. You need at least one of these to justify any processing activity:

1. Consent - The individual has given clear, informed permission
2. Contract - Processing is necessary to fulfill a contract with the individual
3. Legal Obligation - You're required by law to process the data
4. Vital Interests - Processing is necessary to protect someone's life (rarely used)
5. Public Task - You're performing a task in the public interest (government/public bodies)
6. Legitimate Interest - Processing is necessary for your legitimate interests, balanced against individual rights

Most businesses will primarily use three of these: consent, contract, and legitimate interest. Let's break down each one so you can determine which applies to your business operations.

1. Consent: When Asking Permission Is Required

Consent is probably the most talked-about lawful basis, but it's often the most misunderstood. Many businesses default to consent because it seems straightforward: just get people to agree, right?

Not so fast.

What constitutes valid consent under GDPR:

For consent to work as your lawful basis, it must meet strict GDPR consent requirements:

• Freely given - No imbalance of power, no conditions
• Specific - Related to a particular purpose
• Informed - Clear information about what they're agreeing to
• Unambiguous - Requires an affirmative action (no pre-ticked boxes)
• Withdrawable - Easy to withdraw as it was to give

When consent is appropriate:

Consent works best when:

• Processing is truly optional (not required for your core service)
• You're doing something individuals might not expect
• You're giving people genuine choice about how you use their data
• You're willing to stop processing if they withdraw consent

Real business scenarios:

✅ Good use of consent:

• Email marketing newsletters (optional communication)
• Optional cookies that aren't strictly necessary
• Market research and surveys
• Profiling for personalization when not part of core service

❌ Wrong use of consent:

• Processing customer data to fulfill an order (this is contract-based)
• Sending service-related emails about someone's account (legitimate interest)
• Processing employee data for payroll (legal obligation)

The consent trap businesses fall into:

Here's the thing about consent: it gives individuals the strongest rights. They can withdraw consent at any time, and when they do, you generally must delete their data. For many businesses, this creates operational nightmares.

Imagine if every customer could withdraw consent for you to process their order information mid-transaction. Your business would grind to a halt. That's why consent is often the wrong choice for core business operations.

2. Contract: Processing Necessary to Fulfill Agreements

Contract is the lawful basis most businesses should use for their core operations. It's straightforward: if you need to process someone's data to deliver what they've asked for, contract is your legal foundation.

What qualifies as contractual necessity:

Processing is necessary for contract when you literally cannot fulfill your agreement without it. The key word here is necessary—not just convenient or useful, but genuinely required.

Common business use cases:

• Processing customer names and addresses to ship products
• Using email addresses to send order confirmations and delivery updates
• Processing payment information to complete transactions
• Creating user accounts to provide SaaS access
• Storing project data for client deliverables

What doesn't count as "necessary for contract":

This is where businesses often overstep. Just because data would be helpful doesn't make it contractually necessary.

For example:

• Sharing customer data with analytics platforms (not necessary to complete the sale)
• Using purchase history for marketing recommendations (not necessary for the original purchase)
• Collecting phone numbers when email would suffice for order updates

Real example scenarios:

E-commerce business:

• Lawful basis: Contract for processing customer name, shipping address, email, and payment information to fulfill orders
• Lawful basis: Legitimate Interest for using that data to detect fraud or improve customer service
• Lawful basis: Consent for sending marketing emails about new products

SaaS platform:

• Lawful basis: Contract for processing user account information, authentication data, and content they create within the platform
• Lawful basis: Legitimate Interest for logging activity to ensure security and prevent abuse
• Lawful basis: Consent for optional analytics that improve product features

The beauty of contract as a lawful basis is that it's stable. As long as the contract relationship exists, you have a solid legal foundation for processing. No one can withdraw contract-based processing while expecting you to still deliver the service.

3. Legal Obligation: When the Law Requires Processing

Legal obligation is refreshingly simple: if the law requires you to process personal data, you have a lawful basis. No consent needed, no balancing test required.

Examples of legal obligations:

• Tax compliance - Maintaining financial records for tax authorities
• Employment law - Processing employee data for payroll, tax withholding, and benefits
• Anti-money laundering - Customer due diligence requirements for financial institutions
• Industry-specific regulations - HIPAA record-keeping for healthcare, SEC requirements for financial services
• Court orders and legal proceedings - Responding to legitimate legal requests

Industry-specific requirements:

Different sectors face unique legal obligations:

• Financial services: KYC (Know Your Customer) verification, transaction monitoring, reporting suspicious activities
• Healthcare: Medical record retention, mandatory reporting of certain conditions
• HR/Employment: Workplace safety records, discrimination prevention, wage and hour documentation
• Online services: Age verification for child-directed services, copyright infringement reporting

Documentation requirements:

When using legal obligation as your lawful basis, document which specific law requires the processing. Vague references won't cut it if regulators ask questions.

Instead of: "We process this data for legal compliance"

Write: "We retain this data for 7 years to comply with Section 6501 of the Internal Revenue Code, which requires preservation of financial records"

Real example scenarios:

HR Department:

• Legal Obligation for processing Social Security numbers for tax withholding (IRS requirement)
• Legal Obligation for maintaining records of workplace injuries (OSHA requirement)
• Contract for processing emergency contact information (necessary for employment agreement)
• Legitimate Interest for conducting reference checks on job candidates

Legal obligation is the most bulletproof lawful basis because the law literally mandates it. When you have a legitimate legal obligation, use it. It's that simple.

4. Vital Interests: Life-or-Death Situations Only

Vital interests sounds dramatic—and it should, because it's reserved for genuinely life-threatening scenarios.

When this lawful basis applies:

Vital interests can only be used when processing is necessary to protect someone's life or physical integrity. We're talking about:

• Emergency medical treatment when consent isn't possible
• Humanitarian crises and disaster response
• Urgent public health situations

Why this rarely applies to businesses:

Unless you're operating an emergency medical service or humanitarian organization, you'll almost never use vital interests as your lawful basis. I've reviewed hundreds of business privacy programs, and I can count on one hand the number that legitimately needed this basis.

If you're considering vital interests for a business use case, you're probably on the wrong track. Revisit the other lawful bases.

Real example scenarios:

✅ Legitimate use:

• Emergency room processing patient data without consent during a crisis
• First responders accessing medical history during a cardiac event

❌ Not legitimate:

• Health apps claiming vital interests for general health tracking
• Employers processing health data for wellness programs

Bottom line: unless someone's life is literally at risk, use a different lawful basis.

5. Public Task: Government and Public Authority Processing

Public task is specifically for government bodies, public authorities, and organizations exercising official authority. If you're a private business, this lawful basis almost certainly doesn't apply to you.

When this applies:

• Government agencies performing statutory functions
• Public universities processing student data for educational purposes
• Law enforcement agencies conducting investigations
• Public health authorities managing disease surveillance

Why private businesses can't use this:

Even if your business provides a valuable public service or works on government contracts, you're still not exercising "official authority" in the legal sense. You'll need to rely on contract, legitimate interest, or another lawful basis.

Real example scenarios:

✅ Appropriate use:

• DMV processing driver's license applications
• Public school maintaining student education records
• City government managing public utility billing

❌ Cannot use this:

• Private contractors providing services to government
• Non-profit organizations with public benefit missions
• Businesses in heavily regulated industries

If you're reading this as a private business owner or compliance professional, you can safely skip public task. It's not in your toolkit.

6. Legitimate Interest: The Flexible (But Risky) Option

Legitimate interest is simultaneously the most flexible and most misunderstood lawful basis. It's your go-to when processing doesn't fit neatly into other categories—but it requires careful analysis.

What legitimate interest means:

Legitimate interest allows processing when:

1. You have a genuine, articulated interest in the processing
2. The processing is necessary to achieve that interest
3. Your interest doesn't override the individual's rights and freedoms

That third point is crucial. This isn't a free pass to do whatever you want with data.

The three-part Legitimate Interest Assessment (LIA):

Before using legitimate interest, you must conduct a balancing test:

Part 1: Purpose Test

• What is your legitimate interest?
• Is it real and present (not vague or speculative)?
• Is it lawful?

Part 2: Necessity Test

• Is this processing actually necessary to achieve your interest?
• Could you achieve the same goal in a less intrusive way?

Part 3: Balancing Test

• What impact does processing have on individuals?
• Would they reasonably expect this processing?
• Can individuals easily exercise their rights?
• Does your interest outweigh potential harm?

When to use legitimate interest:

Legitimate interest works well for:

• Fraud prevention and security monitoring
• Network and information security
• Internal administration and business operations
• Marketing to existing customers about similar products
• Personalization that's expected as part of service
• Sharing data within a corporate group

When to avoid legitimate interest:

Don't use legitimate interest for:

• Anything you could easily get consent for
• Processing that would surprise or concern individuals
• Large-scale profiling or automated decision-making
• Selling or sharing data with third parties for their purposes
• Anything involving special category (sensitive) data

Real example scenarios:

SaaS Company:

✅ Good use of legitimate interest:

• Analyzing usage patterns to improve product performance
• Monitoring for suspicious login attempts to protect accounts
• Sending service updates and security notifications to existing customers
• Sharing data with payment processors to prevent fraud

❌ Bad use of legitimate interest:

• Selling customer data to data brokers
• Extensive behavioral profiling for targeted advertising
• Sharing customer lists with partners without clear necessity

E-commerce Business:

✅ Good use of legitimate interest:

• Analyzing cart abandonment to improve checkout process
• Recommending products based on browsing history (when expected)
• Detecting payment fraud through transaction pattern analysis
• Sending order-related emails about similar products to existing customers

❌ Bad use of legitimate interest:

• Building detailed psychological profiles of customers
• Tracking users across unrelated websites
• Sharing purchase history with third-party advertisers

Common mistakes with legitimate interest:

1. Assuming your interest automatically wins - The balancing test is real. Just because you want to do something doesn't mean it's legitimately justified.

2. Not documenting your assessment - Regulators expect to see your LIA. "We thought about it" doesn't cut it. You need documented analysis.

3. Using it as a consent alternative - If processing would surprise people or seems invasive, get consent. Don't try to justify it through legitimate interest.

4. Forgetting the necessity test - Could you achieve the same goal with less data or less intrusive processing? If yes, your current approach isn't necessary.

My recommendation:

Legitimate interest is powerful, but it's not a shortcut around consent. Use it for processing that's genuinely in everyone's interest (like security) or clearly expected (like improving your service). Document your reasoning thoroughly. And when in doubt, err on the side of transparency and consent.

How to Choose the Right Lawful Basis: A Decision Framework

Now that you understand each lawful basis, here's a practical framework for choosing the right one:

Step 1: Start with the specific processing activity

Don't try to pick one lawful basis for your entire business. Different activities need different bases. Break it down:

• Collecting customer information at checkout
• Sending marketing emails
• Analyzing website behavior
• Sharing data with payment processors
• Storing data for accounting purposes

Each of these might need a different lawful basis.

Step 2: Ask the elimination questions

Work through these questions in order:

Q1: Are you legally required to do this processing?

• Yes → Legal Obligation (document which law requires it)
• No → Continue to Q2

Q2: Is this necessary to fulfill a contract with the individual?

• Yes → Contract (but make sure it's truly necessary, not just helpful)
• No → Continue to Q3

Q3: Could you reasonably provide your service without this processing?

• No (it's essential to your service) → Probably still Contract
• Yes (it's optional or additional) → Continue to Q4

Q4: Would this processing surprise individuals or seem invasive?

• Yes → You need Consent (and make it genuinely optional)
• No (they'd reasonably expect it) → Continue to Q5

Q5: Is this for your own legitimate business interest?

• Yes → Consider Legitimate Interest (but complete a proper LIA)
• No → Back to Consent

Step 3: Document your decision

Whatever you choose, write down:

• Which lawful basis you're using
• Why that basis is appropriate
• For legitimate interest: your full balancing test analysis
• Where this is communicated to individuals

This documentation goes in your Records of Processing Activities (ROPA) and should inform your privacy policy language.

Decision tree example:

Let's walk through a real scenario:

Scenario: You run an e-commerce business and want to send product recommendations to customers based on their purchase history.

Q1: Legally required? No.

Q2: Necessary for contract? No. The customer already got what they ordered. Recommendations aren't necessary to fulfill that original contract.

Q3: Could you provide service without it? Yes. The customer already received their purchase.

Q4: Would this surprise customers? Maybe. Some customers expect recommendations; others might find them intrusive. This is a judgment call.

Decision: If recommendations are standard practice in your industry and communicated clearly, you could use Legitimate Interest (with proper LIA). If they're more aggressive or unexpected, get Consent.

Best practice: Many e-commerce businesses use legitimate interest for showing recommendations on their website (expected context) but get consent for sending recommendation emails (more intrusive).

Common Lawful Basis Mistakes That Kill Compliance

Even sophisticated businesses make these errors. Avoid them:

Mistake #1: Using consent when contract applies

The problem: You're asking customers to "consent" to process their shipping address to send them their order.

Why it's wrong: This isn't optional. Sending the product requires the address. This is contract-based processing, not consent-based.

The consequence: If they withdraw consent, you're in an impossible position. You can't fulfill the order, but you also have a contractual obligation to do so.

The fix: Use contract for anything necessary to deliver your core service.

Mistake #2: Misunderstanding legitimate interest

The problem: You decide your "legitimate interest" in maximizing profit justifies any data processing that might increase revenue.

Why it's wrong: Legitimate interest requires a balancing test. Your business interests don't automatically override individual rights.

The consequence: Regulators will scrutinize your legitimate interest assessments. If you can't show genuine necessity and appropriate balancing, you're exposed to enforcement action.

The fix: Complete a proper Legitimate Interest Assessment for each use case. Document your reasoning. Be honest about whether the processing would surprise individuals.

Mistake #3: Switching lawful bases mid-stream

The problem: You start with consent, then realize contract would be easier, so you switch without telling anyone.

Why it's wrong: GDPR requires you to get it right from the start. You can't simply change lawful bases because the first one is inconvenient.

The consequence: Your privacy documentation becomes inaccurate. Data subject rights change. You may need to re-justify all your processing.

The fix: Think carefully about lawful basis before you start processing. If you absolutely must switch, you need to:

• Document why the original basis was incorrect
• Ensure the new basis was valid from the start
• Update all privacy communications
• Notify affected individuals if the change impacts their rights

Mistake #4: Not documenting your decision

The problem: You choose a lawful basis but never write down your reasoning.

Why it's wrong: GDPR accountability requires documentation. In an audit or investigation, "we thought about it" won't satisfy regulators.

The consequence: You can't demonstrate compliance. Even if your choice was correct, you'll face challenges if you can't prove your decision-making process.

The fix: Document every lawful basis decision in your ROPA. For legitimate interest, maintain written LIAs. Keep these records updated.

Mistake #5: Using multiple bases incorrectly

The problem: You list several lawful bases for the same processing, thinking more is better.

Why it's wrong: Each specific processing activity should have one appropriate lawful basis. Listing multiple bases suggests you haven't properly analyzed your processing.

The consequence: Confusion about data subject rights, unclear privacy communications, and regulatory skepticism.

The fix: Be precise. Different processing activities can have different bases, but each specific activity gets one basis.

For example:

• Processing customer orders: Contract
• Fraud detection on those orders: Legitimate Interest
• Marketing emails about new products: Consent

These are separate activities with separate bases, not one activity with three bases.

Industry-Specific Lawful Basis Examples

Different industries face unique processing scenarios. Here's how lawful bases typically apply:

SaaS and Technology Companies

Processing Activity	Recommended Lawful Basis	Notes
User account creation and authentication	Contract	Necessary to provide the service
Product analytics and usage statistics	Legitimate Interest	Improving service performance; conduct LIA
Security logging and threat detection	Legitimate Interest	Protecting users and business
Customer support communications	Contract	Part of service delivery
Product marketing to existing customers	Legitimate Interest	For similar products/features only
Optional beta features and testing	Consent	Truly optional enhancements
Third-party integrations	Contract or Consent	Contract if necessary for core service; Consent if optional

E-commerce and Retail

Processing Activity	Recommended Lawful Basis	Notes
Order processing and fulfillment	Contract	Core transaction processing
Payment processing	Contract	Necessary to complete purchase
Fraud and chargeback prevention	Legitimate Interest	Protecting business and customers
Product recommendations on site	Legitimate Interest	Expected personalization; conduct LIA
Email marketing newsletters	Consent	Optional marketing communication
Customer service inquiries	Contract	Part of purchase agreement
Returns and refunds processing	Contract	Fulfilling contractual obligations
Loyalty programs	Consent or Contract	Consent if optional; Contract if condition of purchase

Marketing and Advertising Agencies

Processing Activity	Recommended Lawful Basis	Notes
Client campaign management	Contract	Delivering contracted services
Campaign performance analytics	Contract	Necessary for reporting and optimization
Lead generation for clients	Consent (from leads)	Leads must consent to contact
Client reporting and deliverables	Contract	Part of agency agreement
Internal case studies	Consent	Need client permission for public use
Creative asset storage	Contract	Necessary for project completion

B2B Service Providers

Processing Activity	Recommended Lawful Basis	Notes
Service delivery and client management	Contract	Core business operations
Business contact information	Legitimate Interest	Standard B2B practices
Project collaboration and file sharing	Contract	Necessary for service delivery
Client billing and accounting	Contract + Legal Obligation	Contract for billing; legal obligation for tax records
Quality assurance and auditing	Legitimate Interest	Business improvement; internal operations
Referrals and testimonials	Consent	Need explicit permission for marketing use

Key principle across all industries:

Your lawful basis should reflect the real nature of the processing. Don't stretch definitions to make something fit. If you're unsure, the decision framework from the previous section will help you work through the logic.

How to Document Your Lawful Basis Decision

Choosing your lawful basis is only half the battle. You must document it properly in multiple places.

1. Privacy Policy

Your privacy policy must clearly state:

• What data you process
• For what purposes
• On what lawful basis

Example language:

❌ Vague (non-compliant): "We process your personal data in accordance with applicable privacy laws."

✅ Clear (compliant): "We process your name, email address, and shipping address on the lawful basis of contract performance—this processing is necessary to fulfill your order and deliver products you've purchased from us."

2. Records of Processing Activities (ROPA)

Your ROPA documentation must include the lawful basis for each processing activity. This is a legal requirement under GDPR Article 30.

ROPA entry example:

Processing Activity: Customer Order Fulfillment
Data Processed: Name, email, shipping address, payment information
Purpose: Process and deliver customer orders
Lawful Basis: Article 6(1)(b) - Contract performance
Retention Period: 7 years (tax compliance requirements)

3. Internal Documentation

For legitimate interest, you need documented Legitimate Interest Assessments (LIAs). These should include:

• Clear statement of your legitimate interest
• Explanation of why processing is necessary
• Assessment of impact on individuals
• Balancing test conclusion
• Date of assessment and reviewer

4. Data Processing Agreements (DPAs)

When sharing data with processors, your DPAs should specify:

• The lawful basis you're relying on
• Instructions for how the processor should handle the data
• Confirmation that processing aligns with your stated lawful basis

5. Consent Records

If using consent, maintain records showing:

• What the individual consented to
• When they consented
• How consent was obtained
• That consent met GDPR's requirements

This isn't paranoia—it's accountability. Regulators expect to see this documentation if they audit your compliance.

Can You Change Your Lawful Basis?

The short answer: you generally can't switch lawful bases just because one becomes inconvenient.

GDPR's position on switching:

The regulation doesn't explicitly prohibit changing lawful bases, but the UK Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) and other regulators have made their position clear: you must get your lawful basis right from the beginning.

Why switching is problematic:

Different lawful bases provide different rights to individuals:

• Consent-based processing: Individuals can withdraw consent at any time, triggering data deletion
• Contract-based processing: Individuals cannot object if processing is genuinely necessary for contract performance
• Legitimate interest: Individuals have the right to object based on their particular situation

If you switch from consent to legitimate interest, you're effectively removing rights that individuals previously had. That's not acceptable under GDPR's principles.

Rare circumstances where switching is allowed:

You might be able to change lawful bases if:

1. You made a genuine mistake in initial assessment - You misunderstood your processing or GDPR requirements at the outset, and upon proper analysis, realize a different basis applies.

2. The nature of processing fundamentally changes - If the purpose or method of processing changes significantly, you might reassess lawful basis for the new processing (but this is effectively new processing, not switching bases for existing processing).

3. Regulatory guidance changes - New supervisory authority guidance clarifies that your industry should use a different basis than previously understood.

How to handle transitions if absolutely necessary:

If you must change lawful bases:

1. Document why the original basis was incorrect - Show your analysis and reasoning

2. Ensure the new basis was valid from the start - You can't retroactively create a lawful basis; it must have existed all along

3. Update all privacy communications - Privacy policy, notices, ROPA

4. Notify affected individuals - Especially if their rights change as a result

5. Prepare for scrutiny - Regulators will question why you're changing, so have solid justification

My strong recommendation:

Invest time upfront to choose the correct lawful basis. Consult privacy compliance resources and tools that help you think through these decisions systematically. The cost of getting it wrong and having to switch far exceeds the cost of careful initial analysis.

Special Considerations for Sensitive Data

Everything we've discussed applies to "regular" personal data. But GDPR treats certain types of data as special categories requiring extra protection.

Article 9 special category data includes:

• Racial or ethnic origin
• Political opinions
• Religious or philosophical beliefs
• Trade union membership
• Genetic data
• Biometric data (when used for identification)
• Health data
• Sex life or sexual orientation

Why this matters for lawful basis:

For special category data, Article 6 lawful bases aren't enough. You need:

1. An Article 6 lawful basis (one of the six we've discussed)
2. PLUS an Article 9 condition allowing processing of special category data

Article 9 conditions include:

• Explicit consent (not just regular consent—must be explicit)
• Processing necessary for employment law obligations
• Protecting vital interests when consent isn't possible
• Processing by not-for-profit organizations
• Data manifestly made public by the individual
• Legal claims and judicial proceedings
• Substantial public interest
• Healthcare and medical purposes
• Public health
• Archiving, research, and statistics (with safeguards)

Real-world impact:

Let's say you run a health and wellness app:

For general wellness tracking:

• Article 6 basis: Consent
• Article 9 condition: Explicit consent for health data
• Result: You need explicit consent specifically for health data processing

For corporate wellness program (employer):

• Article 6 basis: Consent (employment isn't contract-based for this)
• Article 9 condition: Employment law obligation or explicit consent
• Result: Most employers use explicit consent to avoid ambiguity

For research using health data:

• Article 6 basis: Legitimate interest (with strong LIA)
• Article 9 condition: Research exception with appropriate safeguards
• Result: Need ethics approval, anonymization, and robust security

Common mistake:

Assuming regular consent is enough for special category data. It's not. You need explicit consent that specifically addresses the special category data you're processing.

My advice:

If you're processing special category data, get legal advice. The Article 9 conditions have strict requirements, and getting this wrong carries significant regulatory risk. This is one area where "good enough" isn't good enough.

How PrivacyForge Simplifies Lawful Basis Selection

Choosing lawful basis requires legal analysis, business understanding, and careful documentation. That's exactly what PrivacyForge is designed to handle.

Our intelligent questionnaire approach:

Instead of presenting you with dense legal text and hoping you figure it out, PrivacyForge guides you through a structured assessment:

1. We ask about your specific processing activities - What data you collect, why you collect it, and how you use it

2. We identify the appropriate lawful basis - Our system applies the decision framework we've covered in this guide, analyzing your answers against GDPR requirements

3. We generate compliant documentation - Your privacy policy automatically reflects the correct lawful basis with proper legal language

4. We ensure consistency - Your lawful basis choice flows through your privacy policy, cookie notices, and Records of Processing Activities—no conflicts, no gaps

For legitimate interest assessments:

When legitimate interest is the right choice, we don't just assume it works. PrivacyForge:

• Walks you through the three-part LIA
• Helps you articulate your legitimate interest clearly
• Assesses necessity and proportionality
• Guides you through the balancing test
• Generates documented LIAs ready for regulatory review

No more guesswork:

The biggest risk with lawful basis is getting it wrong in the first place. PrivacyForge eliminates guesswork by:

• Applying up-to-date regulatory guidance
• Checking your choices against common compliance mistakes
• Flagging situations where you might need legal review
• Providing clear explanations of why each basis applies (or doesn't)

Time savings:

What takes compliance professionals hours or days to analyze and document, PrivacyForge handles in minutes. But speed doesn't mean shortcuts—our system applies the same rigorous analysis a privacy lawyer would use, just faster and more consistently.

The result:

Privacy documentation that actually protects your business because it's built on the correct legal foundation from day one.

Your Next Steps for GDPR Lawful Basis Compliance

You now understand the six lawful bases, how to choose the right one, and why this decision is so critical. Here's what to do next:

Immediate actions (this week):

1. Audit your current processing activities

   • List every way you collect and use personal data
   • Identify the purpose for each processing activity
   • Note what lawful basis you've claimed (if any)

2. Review your current lawful basis choices

   • Are you using consent when contract would be more appropriate?
   • Have you documented your legitimate interest assessments?
   • Is each processing activity clearly tied to one lawful basis?

3. Check your privacy policy

   • Does it clearly state your lawful basis for each processing purpose?
   • Is the language specific rather than vague?
   • Does it match your actual processing practices?

Medium-term actions (this month):

4. Update your ROPA documentation

   • Ensure every processing activity lists its lawful basis
   • For legitimate interest, attach documented LIAs
   • Review with your team to ensure accuracy

5. Fix any misalignments

   • If you've been using the wrong lawful basis, document why
   • Update your privacy communications consistently
   • Consider whether you need to notify individuals of changes

6. Implement documentation systems

   • If using consent, ensure you're keeping proper records
   • Create templates for LIAs to use for new processing activities
   • Set up processes to review lawful basis for new initiatives

Long-term actions (ongoing):

7. Make lawful basis part of your privacy-by-design process

   • Before launching new products or features, assess lawful basis
   • Include lawful basis analysis in your Privacy Impact Assessments
   • Train your team to think about legal foundations, not just data collection

8. Stay updated on regulatory guidance

   • Supervisory authorities regularly publish new guidance on lawful basis
   • Join privacy professional communities
   • Review enforcement actions to learn from others' mistakes

9. Consider professional tools and support

   • Manual management of lawful basis gets complex as you scale
   • Automated systems ensure consistency across all your privacy documentation
   • PrivacyForge handles the complexity so you can focus on your business

The bottom line:

Getting lawful basis right isn't just about compliance—it's about building a sustainable foundation for how you handle personal data. Every privacy policy you create, every data processing agreement you sign, and every customer interaction you have flows from this fundamental decision.

Make it a deliberate, documented, defensible choice. Your future self (and your legal team) will thank you.

---

Ready to simplify your GDPR lawful basis documentation? Get started and let our intelligent system guide you through lawful basis selection and generate compliant privacy documentation automatically. No legal degree required.